ACEBEAM
L16 2.0
- Lumens
- 2,100 lm
- Throw
- 410 m
- Runtime (High)
- 90 min
- Weight
- 148 g
- Battery
- 21700
Currently unavailable
Head-to-Head Comparison
ACEBEAM L16 2.0 vs ACEBEAM L19 2.0
Side-by-side specs, scores, and Amazon pricing. Winner badges show which model leads each profile. Full spec comparison is included below.
ACEBEAM
L19 2.0
- Lumens
- 2,200 lm
- Throw
- 1,083 m
- Runtime (High)
- 62 min
- Weight
- 284 g
- Battery
- 21700
$119.99Check Price on AmazonLast checked 6 days ago
Winner by Profile
- Tactical: ACEBEAM L19 2.0 (86.8 vs 85.0)
- Everyday Carry: ACEBEAM L16 2.0 (83.5 vs 83.0)
- Value: ACEBEAM L16 2.0 (78.2 vs 77.7)
- Throw: ACEBEAM L19 2.0 (91.8 vs 85.4)
- Flood: ACEBEAM L16 2.0 (84.6 vs 83.9)
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beam Pattern | ||
| ▾Price & Scores2 | ||
| Price | $110 | $120 |
| MSRP | $90 | $120 |
| ▾Output & Beam7 | ||
| Max Lumens | 2,100 lm | 2,200 lm |
| Sustained Lumens | 900 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak Candela | 42,000 cd | 293,222 cd |
| Beam Distance | 410 m | 1,083 m |
| Beam Pattern | throw | throw |
| IP Rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Impact Resistance | 2.0 m | 1.0 m |
| ▾Runtime3 | ||
| Runtime (High) | 90 min | 62 min |
| Runtime (500lm) | 120 min | — |
| Turbo Stepdown | 45 s | — |
| ▾Physical5 | ||
| Weight | 148 g | 284 g |
| Length | 140 mm | 164 mm |
| Head Diameter | 35.0 mm | 60.0 mm |
| Body Diameter | 27.0 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| ▾Battery & Charging6 | ||
| Battery Type | 21700 | 21700 |
| Charging | usb-c | usb-c |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | Yes |
| Battery Included | No | No |
| Rechargeable Battery | No | No |
| ▾Features7 | ||
| Switch Type | dual | dual |
| Strobe Mode | No | No |
| Memory Mode | No | No |
| Lockout | No | No |
| Moonlight Mode | No | No |
| Magnetic Tailcap | No | No |
| Pocket Clip | No | No |
| ▾Checklist9 | ||
| Impact Resistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Waterproof | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB-C Rechargeable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Battery Replaceable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Strobe Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Memory Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Lockout | ✗ | ✗ |
| Magnetic Tailcap | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pocket Clip | ✗ | ✗ |
| ▾Category Scores5 | ||
| Tactical Score | 85.0 | 86.8 |
| EDC Score | 83.5 | 83.0 |
| Value Score | 78.2 | 77.7 |
| Throw Score | 85.4 | 91.8 |
| Flood Score | 84.6 | 83.9 |
| ▾Amazon3 | ||
| Amazon Reviews | 18 | 5 |
| Amazon Rating | 4.8 | 5.0 |
| Release Year | 2,024 | 2,022 |
Our Verdict
The ACEBEAM L19 2.0 leads here with a higher throw score (91.8 vs 85.4). Choose it for throw tasks. The ACEBEAM L16 2.0 is still solid for throw and offers better value.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Pricing and availability can change quickly. Always use Check Price on Amazon for current details.