ACEBEAM
L16 2.0
- Lumens
- 2,100 lm
- Throw
- 410 m
- Runtime (High)
- 90 min
- Weight
- 148 g
- Battery
- 21700
Currently unavailable
Head-to-Head Comparison
ACEBEAM L16 2.0 vs Fenix TK22 TAC
Side-by-side specs, scores, and Amazon pricing. Winner badges show which model leads each profile. Full spec comparison is included below.
Fenix
TK22 TAC
- Lumens
- 2,800 lm
- Throw
- 540 m
- Runtime (High)
- 210 min
- Weight
- 156 g
- Battery
- 21700
Currently unavailable
Winner by Profile
- Tactical: Fenix TK22 TAC (90.0 vs 85.0)
- Everyday Carry: ACEBEAM L16 2.0 (83.5 vs 81.8)
- Value: Fenix TK22 TAC (82.7 vs 78.2)
- Throw: Fenix TK22 TAC (91.5 vs 85.4)
- Flood: ACEBEAM L16 2.0 (84.6 vs 84.4)
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beam Pattern | ||
| ▾Price & Scores2 | ||
| Price | $110 | $120 |
| MSRP | $90 | $120 |
| ▾Output & Beam7 | ||
| Max Lumens | 2,100 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Sustained Lumens | 900 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak Candela | 42,000 cd | 72,900 cd |
| Beam Distance | 410 m | 540 m |
| Beam Pattern | throw | throw |
| IP Rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Impact Resistance | 2.0 m | 2.0 m |
| ▾Runtime3 | ||
| Runtime (High) | 90 min | 210 min |
| Runtime (500lm) | 120 min | — |
| Turbo Stepdown | 45 s | 180 s |
| ▾Physical5 | ||
| Weight | 148 g | 156 g |
| Length | 140 mm | 154 mm |
| Head Diameter | 35.0 mm | 40.0 mm |
| Body Diameter | 27.0 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| ▾Battery & Charging6 | ||
| Battery Type | 21700 | 21700 |
| Charging | usb-c | usb-c |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | Yes |
| Battery Included | No | No |
| Rechargeable Battery | No | No |
| ▾Features7 | ||
| Switch Type | dual | dual |
| Strobe Mode | No | No |
| Memory Mode | No | No |
| Lockout | No | No |
| Moonlight Mode | No | No |
| Magnetic Tailcap | No | No |
| Pocket Clip | No | No |
| ▾Checklist9 | ||
| Impact Resistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Waterproof | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB-C Rechargeable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Battery Replaceable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Strobe Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Memory Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Lockout | ✗ | ✗ |
| Magnetic Tailcap | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pocket Clip | ✗ | ✗ |
| ▾Category Scores5 | ||
| Tactical Score | 85.0 | 90.0 |
| EDC Score | 83.5 | 81.8 |
| Value Score | 78.2 | 82.7 |
| Throw Score | 85.4 | 91.5 |
| Flood Score | 84.6 | 84.4 |
| ▾Amazon3 | ||
| Amazon Reviews | 18 | 580 |
| Amazon Rating | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| Release Year | 2,024 | 2,022 |
Our Verdict
The Fenix TK22 TAC leads here with a higher throw score (91.5 vs 85.4). Choose it for throw tasks. The ACEBEAM L16 2.0 is still solid for throw and offers better value.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Pricing and availability can change quickly. Always use Check Price on Amazon for current details.