ACEBEAM
L19 2.0
- Lumens
- 2,200 lm
- Throw
- 1,083 m
- Runtime (High)
- 62 min
- Weight
- 284 g
- Battery
- 21700
$119.99Check Price on AmazonLast checked 4h ago
Head-to-Head Comparison
ACEBEAM L19 2.0 vs Fenix TK22 TAC
Side-by-side specs, scores, and Amazon pricing. Winner badges show which model leads each profile. Full spec comparison is included below.
Fenix
TK22 TAC
- Lumens
- 2,800 lm
- Throw
- 540 m
- Runtime (High)
- 210 min
- Weight
- 156 g
- Battery
- 21700
Currently unavailable
Winner by Profile
- Tactical: Fenix TK22 TAC (90.0 vs 86.8)
- Everyday Carry: ACEBEAM L19 2.0 (83.0 vs 81.8)
- Value: Fenix TK22 TAC (82.7 vs 77.7)
- Throw: ACEBEAM L19 2.0 (91.8 vs 91.5)
- Flood: Fenix TK22 TAC (84.4 vs 83.9)
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beam Pattern | ||
| ▾Price & Scores2 | ||
| Price | $120 | $120 |
| MSRP | $120 | $120 |
| ▾Output & Beam7 | ||
| Max Lumens | 2,200 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Sustained Lumens | 1,200 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak Candela | 293,222 cd | 72,900 cd |
| Beam Distance | 1,083 m | 540 m |
| Beam Pattern | throw | throw |
| IP Rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Impact Resistance | 1.0 m | 2.0 m |
| ▾Runtime2 | ||
| Runtime (High) | 62 min | 210 min |
| Turbo Stepdown | — | 180 s |
| ▾Physical5 | ||
| Weight | 284 g | 156 g |
| Length | 164 mm | 154 mm |
| Head Diameter | 60.0 mm | 40.0 mm |
| Body Diameter | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| ▾Battery & Charging6 | ||
| Battery Type | 21700 | 21700 |
| Charging | usb-c | usb-c |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | Yes |
| Battery Included | No | No |
| Rechargeable Battery | No | No |
| ▾Features7 | ||
| Switch Type | dual | dual |
| Strobe Mode | No | No |
| Memory Mode | No | No |
| Lockout | No | No |
| Moonlight Mode | No | No |
| Magnetic Tailcap | No | No |
| Pocket Clip | No | No |
| ▾Checklist9 | ||
| Impact Resistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Waterproof | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB-C Rechargeable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Battery Replaceable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Strobe Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Memory Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Lockout | ✗ | ✗ |
| Magnetic Tailcap | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pocket Clip | ✗ | ✗ |
| ▾Category Scores5 | ||
| Tactical Score | 86.8 | 90.0 |
| EDC Score | 83.0 | 81.8 |
| Value Score | 77.7 | 82.7 |
| Throw Score | 91.8 | 91.5 |
| Flood Score | 83.9 | 84.4 |
| ▾Amazon3 | ||
| Amazon Reviews | 5 | 580 |
| Amazon Rating | 5.0 | 4.7 |
| Release Year | 2,022 | 2,022 |
Our Verdict
These two are closely matched. The ACEBEAM L19 2.0 scores 91.8 (best for throw) while the Fenix TK22 TAC scores 91.5 (best for throw). Your decision should come down to which use case matters more to you.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Pricing and availability can change quickly. Always use Check Price on Amazon for current details.