Energizer
Auto-On LED Rechargeable
- Lumens
- 1 lm
- Throw
- —
- Runtime (High)
- —
- Weight
- —
- Battery
- —
Head-to-Head Comparison
Energizer Auto-On LED Rechargeable vs Fenix TK22 TAC
Side-by-side specs, scores, and Amazon pricing. Winner badges show which model leads each profile. Full spec comparison is included below.
Fenix
TK22 TAC
- Lumens
- 2,800 lm
- Throw
- 540 m
- Runtime (High)
- 210 min
- Weight
- 156 g
- Battery
- 21700
Winner by Profile
- Tactical: Fenix TK22 TAC (90.0 vs 74.5)
- Everyday Carry: Energizer Auto-On LED Rechargeable (85.7 vs 81.8)
- Value: Energizer Auto-On LED Rechargeable (97.0 vs 82.7)
- Throw: Fenix TK22 TAC (91.5 vs 78.6)
- Flood: Fenix TK22 TAC (84.4 vs 82.5)
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beam Pattern | ||
| ▾Price & Scores2 | ||
| Price | $26 | $120 |
| MSRP | $31 | $120 |
| ▾Output & Beam7 | ||
| Max Lumens | 1 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Sustained Lumens | — | 800 lm |
| Peak Candela | — | 72,900 cd |
| Beam Distance | — | 540 m |
| Beam Pattern | hybrid | throw |
| IP Rating | IPX4 | IP68 |
| Impact Resistance | 1.0 m | 2.0 m |
| ▾Runtime2 | ||
| Runtime (High) | — | 210 min |
| Turbo Stepdown | — | 180 s |
| ▾Physical5 | ||
| Weight | — | 156 g |
| Length | — | 154 mm |
| Head Diameter | — | 40.0 mm |
| Body Diameter | — | 25.4 mm |
| Body Material | Polymer | Aluminum |
| ▾Battery & Charging6 | ||
| Battery Type | — | 21700 |
| Charging | usb-c | usb-c |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Replaceable Battery | No | Yes |
| Battery Included | No | No |
| Rechargeable Battery | No | No |
| ▾Features7 | ||
| Switch Type | side | dual |
| Strobe Mode | No | No |
| Memory Mode | No | No |
| Lockout | No | No |
| Moonlight Mode | No | No |
| Magnetic Tailcap | No | No |
| Pocket Clip | No | No |
| ▾Checklist9 | ||
| Impact Resistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Waterproof | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB-C Rechargeable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Battery Replaceable | ✗ | ✓ |
| Strobe Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Memory Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Lockout | ✗ | ✗ |
| Magnetic Tailcap | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pocket Clip | ✗ | ✗ |
| ▾Category Scores5 | ||
| Tactical Score | 74.5 | 90.0 |
| EDC Score | 85.7 | 81.8 |
| Value Score | 97.0 | 82.7 |
| Throw Score | 78.6 | 91.5 |
| Flood Score | 82.5 | 84.4 |
| ▾Amazon3 | ||
| Amazon Reviews | 16,770 | 580 |
| Amazon Rating | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Release Year | 2,021 | 2,022 |
Our Verdict
The Energizer Auto-On LED Rechargeable takes the edge with a stronger value profile (97.0 vs 91.5). It's the better pick for value use. The Fenix TK22 TAC may still be worth considering for throw applications.
Explore More
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Pricing and availability can change quickly. Always use Check Price on Amazon for current details.