
Fenix
TK20R V2.0
- Lumens
- 3,000 lm
- Throw
- 475 m
- Runtime (High)
- 225 min
- Weight
- 184 g
- Battery
- 21700
$130.45Check Price on AmazonLast checked 1h ago
Head-to-Head Comparison
Side-by-side specs, scores, and Amazon pricing. Winner badges show which model leads each profile. Full spec comparison is included below.

Fenix

Olight
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beam Pattern | ||
| ▾Price & Scores2 | ||
| Price | $130 | $130 |
| MSRP | $130 | $130 |
| ▾Output & Beam7 | ||
| Max Lumens | 3,000 lm | 800 lm |
| Sustained Lumens | 1,000 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak Candela | 56,400 cd | — |
| Beam Distance | 475 m | — |
| Beam Pattern | throw | flood |
| IP Rating | IP68 | IPX6 |
| Impact Resistance | 2.0 m | 1.0 m |
| ▾Runtime2 | ||
| Runtime (High) | 225 min | — |
| Turbo Stepdown | 180 s | — |
| ▾Physical5 | ||
| Weight | 184 g | — |
| Length | 148 mm | — |
| Head Diameter | 42.0 mm | — |
| Body Diameter | 25.4 mm | — |
| Body Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| ▾Battery & Charging6 | ||
| Battery Type | 21700 | — |
| Charging | usb-c | magnetic |
| USB-C | Yes | No |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | No |
| Battery Included | No | No |
| Rechargeable Battery | Yes | No |
| ▾Features7 | ||
| Switch Type | dual | dual |
| Strobe Mode | Yes | No |
| Memory Mode | Yes | No |
| Lockout | No | No |
| Moonlight Mode | Yes | No |
| Magnetic Tailcap | No | No |
| Pocket Clip | Yes | No |
| ▾Checklist9 | ||
| Impact Resistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Waterproof | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB-C Rechargeable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Battery Replaceable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Strobe Mode | ✓ | ✗ |
| Memory Mode | ✓ | ✗ |
| Lockout | ✗ | ✗ |
| Magnetic Tailcap | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pocket Clip | ✓ | ✗ |
| ▾Emitter & Optics1 | ||
| LED / Emitter | Luminus SFT70 | — |
| ▾Category Scores5 | ||
| Tactical Score | 84.4 | 63.4 |
| EDC Score | 76.9 | 61.6 |
| Value Score | 77.7 | 58.4 |
| Throw Score | 85.0 | 66.7 |
| Flood Score | 80.0 | 60.9 |
| ▾Amazon3 | ||
| Amazon Reviews | 272 | 4,438 |
| Amazon Rating | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Release Year | 2,022 | 2,022 |
The Fenix TK20R V2.0 takes the edge with a stronger throw profile (80.0 vs 64.0). It's the better pick for throw use. The Olight Baldr S may still be worth considering for throw applications or if budget is a priority.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Pricing and availability can change quickly. Always use Check Price buttons for current details.