Fenix
TK22 TAC
- Lumens
- 2,800 lm
- Throw
- 540 m
- Runtime (High)
- 210 min
- Weight
- 156 g
- Battery
- 21700
Head-to-Head Comparison
Fenix TK22 TAC vs ACEBEAM L16 2.0
Side-by-side specs, scores, and Amazon pricing. Winner badges show which model leads each profile. Full spec comparison is included below.
ACEBEAM
L16 2.0
- Lumens
- 2,100 lm
- Throw
- 410 m
- Runtime (High)
- 90 min
- Weight
- 148 g
- Battery
- 21700
Winner by Profile
- Tactical: Fenix TK22 TAC (90.0 vs 85.0)
- Everyday Carry: ACEBEAM L16 2.0 (83.5 vs 81.8)
- Value: Fenix TK22 TAC (82.7 vs 78.2)
- Throw: Fenix TK22 TAC (91.5 vs 85.4)
- Flood: ACEBEAM L16 2.0 (84.6 vs 84.4)
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beam Pattern | ||
| ▾Price & Scores2 | ||
| Price | $120 | $110 |
| MSRP | $120 | $90 |
| ▾Output & Beam7 | ||
| Max Lumens | 2,800 lm | 2,100 lm |
| Sustained Lumens | 800 lm | 900 lm |
| Peak Candela | 72,900 cd | 42,000 cd |
| Beam Distance | 540 m | 410 m |
| Beam Pattern | throw | throw |
| IP Rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Impact Resistance | 2.0 m | 2.0 m |
| ▾Runtime3 | ||
| Runtime (High) | 210 min | 90 min |
| Runtime (500lm) | — | 120 min |
| Turbo Stepdown | 180 s | 45 s |
| ▾Physical5 | ||
| Weight | 156 g | 148 g |
| Length | 154 mm | 140 mm |
| Head Diameter | 40.0 mm | 35.0 mm |
| Body Diameter | 25.4 mm | 27.0 mm |
| Body Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| ▾Battery & Charging6 | ||
| Battery Type | 21700 | 21700 |
| Charging | usb-c | usb-c |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | Yes |
| Battery Included | No | No |
| Rechargeable Battery | No | No |
| ▾Features7 | ||
| Switch Type | dual | dual |
| Strobe Mode | No | No |
| Memory Mode | No | No |
| Lockout | No | No |
| Moonlight Mode | No | No |
| Magnetic Tailcap | No | No |
| Pocket Clip | No | No |
| ▾Checklist9 | ||
| Impact Resistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Waterproof | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB-C Rechargeable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Battery Replaceable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Strobe Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Memory Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Lockout | ✗ | ✗ |
| Magnetic Tailcap | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pocket Clip | ✗ | ✗ |
| ▾Category Scores5 | ||
| Tactical Score | 90.0 | 85.0 |
| EDC Score | 81.8 | 83.5 |
| Value Score | 82.7 | 78.2 |
| Throw Score | 91.5 | 85.4 |
| Flood Score | 84.4 | 84.6 |
| ▾Amazon3 | ||
| Amazon Reviews | 580 | 18 |
| Amazon Rating | 4.7 | 4.8 |
| Release Year | 2,022 | 2,024 |
Our Verdict
The Fenix TK22 TAC takes the edge with a stronger throw profile (91.5 vs 85.4). It's the better pick for throw use. The ACEBEAM L16 2.0 may still be worth considering for throw applications or if budget is a priority.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Pricing and availability can change quickly. Always use Check Price on Amazon for current details.