Fenix
TK22 TAC
- Lumens
- 2,800 lm
- Throw
- 540 m
- Runtime (High)
- 210 min
- Weight
- 156 g
- Battery
- 21700
Head-to-Head Comparison
Fenix TK22 TAC vs NITECORE EDC37
Side-by-side specs, scores, and Amazon pricing. Winner badges show which model leads each profile. Full spec comparison is included below.
NITECORE
EDC37
- Lumens
- 8,000 lm
- Throw
- —
- Runtime (High)
- —
- Weight
- —
- Battery
- —
Winner by Profile
- Tactical: Fenix TK22 TAC (90.0 vs 81.8)
- Everyday Carry: Fenix TK22 TAC (81.8 vs 80.4)
- Value: NITECORE EDC37 (84.4 vs 82.7)
- Throw: Fenix TK22 TAC (91.5 vs 77.5)
- Flood: NITECORE EDC37 (85.3 vs 84.4)
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beam Pattern | ||
| ▾Price & Scores2 | ||
| Price | $120 | $140 |
| MSRP | $120 | $119 |
| ▾Output & Beam7 | ||
| Max Lumens | 2,800 lm | 8,000 lm |
| Sustained Lumens | 800 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak Candela | 72,900 cd | — |
| Beam Distance | 540 m | — |
| Beam Pattern | throw | flood |
| IP Rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Impact Resistance | 2.0 m | 1.5 m |
| ▾Runtime2 | ||
| Runtime (High) | 210 min | — |
| Turbo Stepdown | 180 s | — |
| ▾Physical5 | ||
| Weight | 156 g | — |
| Length | 154 mm | — |
| Head Diameter | 40.0 mm | — |
| Body Diameter | 25.4 mm | — |
| Body Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| ▾Battery & Charging6 | ||
| Battery Type | 21700 | — |
| Charging | usb-c | usb-c |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | No |
| Battery Included | No | No |
| Rechargeable Battery | No | No |
| ▾Features7 | ||
| Switch Type | dual | side |
| Strobe Mode | No | No |
| Memory Mode | No | No |
| Lockout | No | No |
| Moonlight Mode | No | No |
| Magnetic Tailcap | No | No |
| Pocket Clip | No | No |
| ▾Checklist9 | ||
| Impact Resistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Waterproof | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB-C Rechargeable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Battery Replaceable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Strobe Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Memory Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Lockout | ✗ | ✗ |
| Magnetic Tailcap | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pocket Clip | ✗ | ✗ |
| ▾Category Scores5 | ||
| Tactical Score | 90.0 | 81.8 |
| EDC Score | 81.8 | 80.4 |
| Value Score | 82.7 | 84.4 |
| Throw Score | 91.5 | 77.5 |
| Flood Score | 84.4 | 85.3 |
| ▾Amazon3 | ||
| Amazon Reviews | 580 | 419 |
| Amazon Rating | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Release Year | 2,022 | 2,024 |
Our Verdict
The Fenix TK22 TAC takes the edge with a stronger throw profile (91.5 vs 85.3). It's the better pick for throw use. The NITECORE EDC37 may still be worth considering for flood applications.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Pricing and availability can change quickly. Always use Check Price on Amazon for current details.