Fenix
TK22 TAC
- Lumens
- 2,800 lm
- Throw
- 540 m
- Runtime (High)
- 210 min
- Weight
- 156 g
- Battery
- 21700
Head-to-Head Comparison
Fenix TK22 TAC vs Olight Warrior X 4
Side-by-side specs, scores, and Amazon pricing. Winner badges show which model leads each profile. Full spec comparison is included below.
Olight
Warrior X 4
- Lumens
- 2,600 lm
- Throw
- 630 m
- Runtime (High)
- 150 min
- Weight
- 249 g
- Battery
- 21700
Winner by Profile
- Tactical: Fenix TK22 TAC (90.0 vs 89.1)
- Everyday Carry: Fenix TK22 TAC (81.8 vs 80.2)
- Value: Fenix TK22 TAC (82.7 vs 80.5)
- Throw: Olight Warrior X 4 (92.5 vs 91.5)
- Flood: Fenix TK22 TAC (84.4 vs 82.8)
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beam Pattern | ||
| ▾Price & Scores2 | ||
| Price | $120 | $130 |
| MSRP | $120 | $130 |
| ▾Output & Beam7 | ||
| Max Lumens | 2,800 lm | 2,600 lm |
| Sustained Lumens | 800 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak Candela | 72,900 cd | 99,000 cd |
| Beam Distance | 540 m | 630 m |
| Beam Pattern | throw | throw |
| IP Rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Impact Resistance | 2.0 m | 1.5 m |
| ▾Runtime2 | ||
| Runtime (High) | 210 min | 150 min |
| Turbo Stepdown | 180 s | 120 s |
| ▾Physical5 | ||
| Weight | 156 g | 249 g |
| Length | 154 mm | 170 mm |
| Head Diameter | 40.0 mm | 50.0 mm |
| Body Diameter | 25.4 mm | 26.0 mm |
| Body Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| ▾Battery & Charging6 | ||
| Battery Type | 21700 | 21700 |
| Charging | usb-c | usb-c |
| USB-C | No | Yes |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | No |
| Battery Included | No | No |
| Rechargeable Battery | No | Yes |
| ▾Features7 | ||
| Switch Type | dual | dual |
| Strobe Mode | No | Yes |
| Memory Mode | No | Yes |
| Lockout | No | No |
| Moonlight Mode | No | Yes |
| Magnetic Tailcap | No | No |
| Pocket Clip | No | No |
| ▾Checklist9 | ||
| Impact Resistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Waterproof | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB-C Rechargeable | ✗ | ✓ |
| Battery Replaceable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Strobe Mode | ✗ | ✓ |
| Memory Mode | ✗ | ✓ |
| Lockout | ✗ | ✗ |
| Magnetic Tailcap | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pocket Clip | ✗ | ✗ |
| ▾Category Scores5 | ||
| Tactical Score | 90.0 | 89.1 |
| EDC Score | 81.8 | 80.2 |
| Value Score | 82.7 | 80.5 |
| Throw Score | 91.5 | 92.5 |
| Flood Score | 84.4 | 82.8 |
| ▾Amazon3 | ||
| Amazon Reviews | 580 | 550 |
| Amazon Rating | 4.7 | 4.8 |
| Release Year | 2,022 | 2,024 |
Our Verdict
These two are closely matched. The Fenix TK22 TAC scores 91.5 (best for throw) while the Olight Warrior X 4 scores 92.5 (best for throw). Your decision should come down to which use case matters more to you.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Pricing and availability can change quickly. Always use Check Price on Amazon for current details.